Permafrost Game Wiki: What Exists and Where to Look

Short answer: there is no single official Permafrost wiki. What exists is a small ecosystem — an independent fan wiki, a data-driven database site, interactive maps, and the official Steam pages and news feed. Several other games also use the name "Permafrost", so the first thing to do is confirm you are on the 2026 survival game and not a same-name title.

Why results can be confusing

Searching for a Permafrost wiki returns a mix of unrelated pages. One of the top results for the term is a wiki page for a "Permafrost" map in a different game entirely — a 2017 versus-map in a hero shooter — which has nothing to do with the frozen survival game covered on this site. Another long-standing redirect has been a wiki entry for a small 2020 game that also shares the name.

That means the reliable filter is the developer and publisher, not the title. This Permafrost is developed by SpaceRocket Games and published by Toplitz Productions, and it entered PC Early Access on October 9, 2026. If a wiki page does not mention those names, it is almost certainly about something else. 待确认 for the older same-name entries, since the archived source for one of them was not available to re-check.

The independent fan wiki

The most useful fan reference is an independent wiki that describes itself as evidence-based, with pages for the beginner route, crafting, base building, the map, co-op setup, system requirements and store status. Its homepage summarises the game as a story-driven open-world survival sandbox from SpaceRocket Games, published by Toplitz Productions, and it states the same Early Access date and four-player co-op support that appear on the Steam store listing.

Importantly, that wiki is upfront about its own limits. It notes that Early Access instructions may change, and it explicitly avoids inventing PS5 or Xbox launch dates. It also declares itself an independent fan site, not affiliated with the developer or publisher — which is the correct label for a fan wiki, but it is also a reminder that it is secondary material and cannot replace the sources it cites.

The data-driven database site

A second major reference is a data site that reads numbers directly from the game's files, exposing item databases, crafting recipes, quests, locations, traders and an interactive map. Its quest pages list objectives in order, its map page lists regions and named places, and it labels the build it was reading from. Because the numbers are pulled from game data, it is strong for counts and locations, and it says it rebuilds whenever the game updates.

The trade-off is that data can be ahead of or behind the live build, and some of its own figures conflict internally — for example, the same map page shows fast-travel points as both 5 and 6. Treat a data site as the best available approximation, not as a guaranteed current total. 待确认.

Official sources worth bookmarking

The two sources that are not fan material are the official Steam store page and the Steam news feed. The store page carries the AppID, developer and publisher, release date, supported languages, system requirements and the Early Access description. The news feed carries patch notes and developer announcements, which is where you should confirm anything a wiki claims about fixes or known issues.

The developer also points to its Discord as the main community hub, and the game has a subreddit where developer accounts post. Those are good places to ask about changes, but they are conversations, not curated references, so expect a mix of confirmed facts and player guesses.

Maps as part of the wiki landscape

Two interactive maps function as unofficial wiki layers for the world. Both read from the game's own journal map and world files, and both are useful for locating traders, fast-travel points and resource nodes. They disagree on some totals, which is a normal symptom of two projects reading the same Early Access data at different times.

If you need a location, start with a map; if you need a number, cross-check it against a second source. If the two disagree, note the difference and move on rather than assuming one is right.

How to judge a Permafrost wiki page

Use four quick checks. Does the page name SpaceRocket Games or Toplitz Productions? Does it include a checked or updated date close to the current build? Does it separate confirmed information from guesses? And does it link to the official store page or news post it relies on?

A page that fails those checks is not necessarily wrong, but it should not be your only source. This is especially true for dates, prices and patch details, all of which have already changed at least once since launch — the release date itself moved from August 21 to October 9, 2026 before the game shipped.

What is not covered anywhere yet

Some topics genuinely have no reliable reference yet. Console release dates for PS5 and Xbox are not confirmed, crossplay between PC and console is unconfirmed, and there is no verified code list — no official codes were found in this research, so any site publishing "working codes" should be treated with suspicion. Where sources are silent, this wiki marks the gap rather than filling it.

That approach is deliberate. A wiki that guesses is worse than a wiki that admits a gap, because a guessed number or date gets copied and repeated until it looks official.

Permafrost Wiki is an independent fan site. Permafrost and all related names, artwork and assets belong to SpaceRocket Games and Toplitz Productions. This site is not affiliated with or endorsed by them.